NEMA and its Signaling, Protection and Communication Section members cannot guarantee the legal accuracy, thoroughness, or currentness of the information contained on this site/page. The contents of this site are informational only, and should not be considered a substitute for specific legal or compliance advice. To obtain the most accurate and up-to-date information, please consult the applicable legal sources and/or authorities having jurisdiction.
Carbon Monoxide Detection
NEMA advocates at all levels of government—federal, state, and local—for the adoption of carbon monoxide (CO) detection requirements. To date, 39 states have enacted laws or codes requiring the installation of life-saving carbon monoxide detection devices in homes and/or other residential or commercial occupancies. In addition, a handful of states have enacted laws requiring the installation of CO detectors in schools. These initiatives, resulting in growth in home CO alarm and detector use since 1994, are a significant reason for a decline in the death rate.
By providing recommendations and model legislation based on industry consensus standards for product performance and installation requirements, NEMA is working to ensure that consumers have a choice when it comes to quality, affordable carbon monoxide protection. NEMA champions the industry’s position via testimony and letters written to public officials.
NEMA Recommendations and Model Legislation
- NEMA Recommendations for State and Local Adoption of Carbon Monoxide Requirements
- NEMA Model Legislation for Carbon Monoxide Detection
State Requirements for Carbon Monoxide Detection
To date, 39 states have adopted requirements, either by statute or code, mandating the installation of carbon monoxide detection devices in single-family homes, multi-family dwellings, or other residential dwellings and commercial buildings. Please click on the map below to learn more about specific state requirements.
Testimony and Position Statements/Comments/Letters
- NEMA letter to Massachusetts Senator Richard T. Moore in support of HB 2124
- NEMA letter Julie to Stokes in support of HB 570
- NEMA letter to New York Carl Marcellino in support of SB 6657-c
- NEMA letter to North Carolina Senator Jackson, Soucek & Tarte in support of SB 739
- NEMA letter to Maryland Senator Joan Carter in support of SB 1075
- NEMA letter to Ohio Senator Frank LaRose in support of SB 162
- NEMA letter to Pennsylvania Senator Robert Godshall in support of SB 607.
- NEMA Statement on Carbon Monoxide Detection in Schools
- Joint NEMA/SIA/ESA letter on House Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection Subcommittee hearing on H.R. 1796
Issue Briefs/White Papers
- Issue Brief: Carbon Monoxide Detection in Hotels
- Issue Brief: Carbon Monoxide Alarms/Detectors—Affordable Life Safety
- Issue Brief: Carbon Monoxide Detection in Schools
Smoke and Fire Detection
Protecting individuals from health and safety hazards posed by fire and smoke is of critical importance. According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), since the 1970s, when smoke alarms became widely available to U.S. households, the home fire death rate has been reduced by more than 50 percent. States and localities now require the installation of smoke alarms and detectors in nearly all residential construction.
NEMA advocates for a “proactive approach” to fire system design—one that incorporates both smoke/fire detection systems and fire suppression/sprinkler systems. Automatic fire detection and alarm systems, when combined with suppression systems and other elements of a proactive fire protection plan, significantly reduce property damage, personal injuries, and loss of life from fire.
NEMA also believes that state and local laws, codes and regulations should permit the installation of smoke alarm and detection equipment that is properly installed and maintained in accordance with national codes and standards. NEMA does not publicly endorse or oppose any listed detection technology. Instead, NEMA recommends that legislative and code/regulatory bodies avoid enacting technology-specific mandates that could have the unintended consequence of eliminating future consumer choice in installing smoke detection technology that may provide advanced protection for them and their families.
- NEMA Letter to Dr. M. Rony Francis, Georgia Department of Public Health, on the state’s Smoke Alarm Installation and Fire Safety Education Program
- NEMA Letter to Iowa State Fire Marshal Ray Reynolds in support of the “Lives Saved” Program
- NEMA Statement on Smoke Alarms
Issue Briefs/White Papers